Skip to main content

Rediscovering the Firmament – What Day Two of Creation Really Reveals



Day two of creation often gets overlooked because of, well, the prevailing heliocentric globe earth model. While it might be popular to yield to the scientific model, I'd like to spend some time discussing what the Bible states about the earth from a biblical perspective.

For many of us raised in church, we were taught Genesis as the foundation of our faith—but rarely were we encouraged to take it literally when it came to how the earth was formed. Instead, the Genesis narrative has been increasingly spiritualized or explained away to fit within modern scientific theories. But what if we allowed Scripture to speak for itself, without forcing it through the lens of secular science?

On day two of creation, God said:

“Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” (Genesis 1:6, KJV)

The word “firmament” here comes from the Hebrew word “raqia”, which means something solid, stretched out like a vault. It’s described as separating the waters below from the waters above. This is not poetic language—it’s architectural. God wasn’t creating a concept; He was forming structure.

So What Is the Firmament?

According to Scripture, the firmament is a solid dome that God placed above the earth. It’s what He called Heaven (Genesis 1:8). The sun, moon, and stars were set in this firmament on day four—not millions of miles away in infinite space, but within the firmament itself. This perspective completely challenges the modern heliocentric model, which assumes a spinning ball earth flying through endless space.

If we trust the Bible, we must wrestle with this:

  • The earth is not described as a sphere hanging in a vacuum.

  • It’s described as having foundations (Job 38:4), being immovable (1 Chronicles 16:30, Psalm 104:5), and being covered by a solid dome that separates heavenly waters from earthly ones.

  • The stars, moon, and sun move above the earth, not the other way around.

Why Does This Matter?

This isn’t just about the shape of the earth—it’s about authority, trust, and worldview. If we begin questioning the clear words of Genesis, where do we stop? God could have used any words to describe creation. He used firmament, waters above, and a division that seems far from modern cosmology.

The heliocentric model—introduced during the Renaissance and pushed forward by institutions like NASA—places man as a speck in an ever-expanding universe. The biblical model, however, places the earth at the center of creation, with a Creator intimately involved and near.

A Call to Re-Examine

I’m not asking you to throw out everything you’ve learned. I’m inviting you to re-read the Bible with fresh eyes—without assuming the world has already figured it all out. The second day of creation holds more meaning than we’ve given it credit for. Maybe it’s time to stop overlooking it and start seeking understanding, not from science textbooks, but from Scripture.

After all, if God said He created a firmament, why would we believe anything less?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr. W. B. Clark and the 1909 Cancer-Public Health Debate: Parasites as a Cause?

In the early 20th century, as medical science continued to evolve, a variety of theories emerged about the origins and causes of cancer. One of the more controversial voices in this conversation was Dr. W. B. Clark , a physician who, in 1909 , boldly declared that parasites were the primary cause of cancer . His views sparked both intrigue and skepticism within the scientific community, highlighting the tensions between emerging medical theories and established norms of the time. Who Was Dr. W. B. Clark? Dr. W. B. Clark was a practicing physician in Indiana, active during a period when cancer research was still in its infancy. Although not a household name today, he contributed to the growing body of medical speculation and debate surrounding the nature of cancer. At the time, cancer was poorly understood, and treatments were rudimentary at best. Researchers explored a wide range of causes, from environmental factors to heredity — and in Clark's case, infectious organisms . The Par...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lefties Losing It: Snow White actress Rachel Zegler’s ‘massive backflip’

Once Upon a Woke Time… There was a time when Disney enchanted audiences with stories that transcended time—tales of courage, hope, and yes, true love. But in 2025, Snow White —a reboot of the beloved 1937 classic—hit the box office not with a magical bang, but a dismal thud. Critics panned it, audiences stayed away, and even loyal Disney fans were left scratching their heads. Why did it fail? Was it poor marketing? A saturated market? Or could it be that Disney forgot the golden rule: stay out of politics, and let the story shine ? When the Princess Doesn’t Believe in Princes Much of the backlash can be traced to the film’s star, Rachel Zegler. Long before the movie hit theaters, clips surfaced of Zegler dismissing the original Snow White tale. She stated in interviews that the story was outdated, mocked the idea of being “saved by a prince,” and emphasized that her version of Snow White was “not dreaming about true love.” Now, let’s pause for a second. It’s one thing to adapt a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Atrocity of King Leopold: The Horrific Torture of Congolese Children

The Atrocity of King Leopold: The Horrific Torture of Congolese Children History often glosses over the true horror of colonial rule, dressing it in the garb of “civilizing missions” and economic development. But behind the veil of so-called progress lies a chapter soaked in the blood of innocence. One of the most brutal and chilling examples is the reign of King Leopold II of Belgium over the Congo Free State — a period marked by unimaginable cruelty, especially toward children. A Kingdom of Terror From 1885 to 1908, King Leopold II personally owned and ruled the Congo Free State, not as a colony of Belgium, but as his private property. Under the guise of humanitarianism and philanthropy, he established a reign of terror that stripped the land of its resources and the people of their dignity. The primary goal: rubber and ivory. The price: human lives. To maximize rubber production, Leopold’s private army, the Force Publique , enforced brutal quotas on villages. Failure to meet the...
Post a Comment
Read more